🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.